The Smallest to Largest

Smallest to Largest

Smallest to Largest

Have you ever looked around at everyday objects and wondered what they are made of? Easy some may say, wood for a desk, rubber for a tube, but then what is the wood and rubber made of? It is like an infinite path down the road of no return. But for everything as we know it, there is a beginning and an end – life and death. In this article I shall increment from the smallest proven known, and I emphasize on the words known and proven, particle, the photon, to the largest known proven object in existence, the universe. It turns out that this topic is more complicated that can be imagined and will be left open for discussion and review, and please note not all these particles and objects can be measure on the same scale system.

Photon: size 0
This is the beginning of our journey. A photon is an elementary particle, the quantum of the electromagnetic field and the basic “unit” of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation. The mass of a proton is zero but yet can still be observed at both microscopic and macroscopic level due to it not having a rest mass. They exhibit properties of both waves and particles in the sense that they can bump off each other yet behave normally like waves and are diffracted. The photon is massless, has no electric charge, and does not decay spontaneously in empty space. During a molecular, atomic or nuclear transition to a lower energy level, photons of various energy will be emitted, from infrared light to gamma rays with a speed of ‘c’ (speed of light) in open space. There is however a theorized smaller particle, namely the Higgs boson, aka the God particle. But we shall not divulged into that just yet until the folks at CERN make a hopeful discovery.

Neutrino: close to 0
Closely followed to the photon is the neutrino which as well has a mass of near 0. These particles are created as a result of radioactive decay or nuclear reactions such as those in the sun. Neutrinos are very difficult to discover as they pass through objects nearly unnoticeable. Only experiments deep underground where nothing can interfere have scientists observed these particles. Heres a fun fact, more than 50 trillion solar electron neutrinos pass through the human body every second.

Electron: 9.11 × 10^−31 kg
An electron is a subatomic particle that carries a negative electric charge. It has no known substructure and is believed to be a point particle with a mass that is approximately 1836 times less than that of our next particle, the proton. Electrons also have quantum mechanical properties of both a particle and a wave, so they can collide with other particles and be diffracted like light. Electrons are the particles that circulate around the nucleus of an atom. The electron has a mass of just 9.11 × 10^−31 kg.

Quark: < 1.67 × 10^−27 kg
The quark is a fundamental constituent of matter making up stable particles namely hadrons such as protons and neutrons.

Protons/Neutrons: ~1.67 × 10^−27 kg
Protons and neutrons usually form the nucleus of an atom and the majority of an atom’s weight (99.9%). They have a mass of around 1.67×10^−27 kg. The two particles are bound by nuclear force into atomic nuclei.

Atom: 1.67 × 10^−27 to 4.52 × 10^−25 kg
The atom is a basic unit of matter consisting of a dense, central nucleus surrounded by a cloud of negatively charged electrons and a mix of positively charged protons and electrically neutral neutrons at the centre. The masses of atoms range from 1.67 × 10^−27 to 4.52 × 10^−25 kg. More information can be seen in a periodic table.

Molecule: > 1.67 × 10^−27
A molecule, the smallest particle of a substance that retains all the properties of the substance, is composed of one or more atoms. A molecule may consist of atoms of a single chemical element, as with oxygen (O2), or of different elements, as with water (H2O). Most molecules are far too small to be seen with the naked eye, but there are exceptions such as DNA, a macromolecule, that can reach macroscopic sizes. Single molecules cannot usually be observed by light (as noted above), but small molecules and even the outlines of individual atoms may be traced in some circumstances by use of an atomic force microscope.

Red Blood Cells: 6-8μm
Red blood cells are the most common type of blood cell and the vertebrate body’s principal means of delivering oxygen to the body tissues via the blood. They take up oxygen in the lungs or gills and release it while squeezing through the body’s capillaries. There is no standard size for them, but average estimates put them at standard size of about 6-8μm.

Home Sapien: 100µm to 2.72m
The great home sapien, oh what a wonderful creature, James Sweitzer once said: “As much as we have progressed in science, we are still finite creatures with limited conceptual abilities and imperfect observational tools – but add one thing, we are curious at that”. We as a creature are the most highly evolved that lives on this planet Earth. What makes us is our highly developed brains, capable of abstract reasoning, language, introspection, and problem solving. We humans range in size, but the minimum and maximum is ambiguous, for at what stage do we become human once the little sperm enter the egg. Or are we only human once we are born? If we begin at the stage of the egg then we are 100 and 200 µm in diameter so to speak. The tallest human to determined was a man in USA namely Robert Pershing Wadlow at 2.72 m (8 ft 11.1 inches), but of course who knows, there could have been taller people back in the days.

Great Pyramid of Giza: 3.8 million metric tons
Located outside Cairo, Egypt, the great pyramid of Giza is the oldest and largest of the three pyramids located in the vicinity. Construction began around 2540BC and concluded around 20 years after. The pyramid was once 146.6 meters (480.97 feet) tall, but due to erosion is shrank down to a still impressive 138.8 m (455 feet). It is roughly 2,500,000 cubic meters. With an estimated weight of 3.8 million metric tons.

Three Gorges Dam: 34 million metric tons
Next on our list is the Three Gorges Dam, spanning the Yangtze River in China. The dam weighs about 34 million metric tons, has a length of 2,335 meters (7,661 ft) a height of 185 m (607 ft), and width (at the base) of 115 m (377.3 ft). The dams main structure was completed in 2006 for an estimated us$39 billion.

Mount Everest: 3.04 x 10^5kg
Mount Everest is the highest mountain on Earth, and the highest point on the Earth’s crust, as measured by the height above sea level of its summit, 8,848 meters (29,029 ft). The mass is estimated as 3.04 x 10^5kg. The mountain, which is part of the Himalaya range in Asia, is located on the border between Sagarmatha Zone, Nepal, and Tibet, China. Everest has claimed 210 lives, including eight who perished during a 1996 storm high on the mountain. Conditions are so difficult in the death zone that most corpses have been left where they fell. Some of them are visible from standard climbing routes.

Earth: 5.97 × 10^24 kg
Earth is the third planet from the Sun. It is the fifth largest of the eight planets in the solar system, and the largest of the terrestrial planets (non-gas planets) in the Solar System in terms of diameter, mass and density. Its Mean radius is 6,371.0 km and has an estimated mass of Mass 5.97 × 10^24 kg.

Jupiter: 1.90 × 10^27 kg
The next heaviest planet in our solar system is Jupiter with a mass of 317 Earths (1.90 × 10^27 kg). It is the fifth planet from the Sun and the largest planet within the Solar System. It is a gas giant with a mass slightly less than one-thousandth that of the Sun but is two and a half times the mass of all of the other planets in our Solar System combined.

Star: 2100 solar radii or 7 quadrillion Earths
I have groups all stars as one as they vary dramatically in size, our sun is a star and is in fact tiny compared to all others which really does get you thinking, first have a look at this image (notice the sun in that image is not even a pixel!) and then this video – that video should really get you thinking. Our sun has a diameter of 1.39×10^9 m with an estimated mass of 1.99×10^30 kg (332,900 Earths). Now to put that into perspective, the largest known star is VY Canis Majoris with a size between 1,800 and 2,100 solar radii (basically 1800 of our suns can fit in its radius). Assuming the upper size limit of 2100 solar radii, light would take more than 8 hours to travel around the star’s circumference, compared to 14.5 seconds for the sun. It would take over 7,000,000,000,000,000 (7 quadrillion) Earths to fill the volume of VY Canis Majoris.

Galaxy: 200 million LY
A galaxy is a massive, gravitationally bound system that consists of stars and stellar remnants, an interstellar medium of gas and dust, and an important but poorly understood component tentatively dubbed dark matter. Typical galaxies range from dwarfs with as few as ten million  stars up to giants with one trillion stars, all orbiting the galaxy’s center of mass. These galaxies each consist of million to trillions of solar system, which makes you wonder, we cannot possible be alone, especially taking into account that fact that there are 100 billion observable galaxies. In 1961, Dr. Frank Drake developed an equation that estimates the number of technologically advanced civilizations that might exist in our Galaxy alone. Frank Drake’s own current solution to the Drake Equation estimates 10,000 communicative civilizations in the Milky Way.

In 2005, Japanese astronomers have discovered what they call the largest object in the universe: a colossal structure 200 million light-years wide that resembles a swarm of giant green jellyfish. This young galactic blob could reveal how and when the earliest galaxies formed.

Universe: 46.5 billion LY
The universe is the theoretical limit, the all encompassing region that holds everything together. The age of the Universe is about 13.7 billion years, but due to the expansion of space we are now observing objects that are now considerably farther away than a static 13.7 billion light-years distance. The edge of the observable universe is now located about 46.5 billion light-years away. It contains about 10^80 atoms, with the vast majority of the energy density contributed by the mysterious dark matter and dark energy. Some theories however state that the ‘World (meaning everything possible in this context)’ consists of many galaxies. Picture them as sheets of paper next to each other flowing in the wind. A theory developed from this was that two of these papers struck each other and started off the development of out universe from the big bang.

What really got me thinking is that atoms are somewhat like solar systems, with the sun as the nucleus and planets as electrons. Now atoms make up molecules in the same way that solar systems make up galaxies. Galaxies compose the universe along with the mysterious dark matter the same way that quarks and electrons, protons and neutrons make up atoms. So from this sort of ratio the universe contains all the galaxies and solar systems etc. what if the so called God particle is a universe?

The upper and lower boundaries of this list are not static and are just known facts we currently have. So lets summarize the scale line:
Photon – Neutrino – Electron – Quark – Proton/Neutron – Atom – Molecule – Red Blood Cell – Homo Sapien – Three Gorges Dam – Mount Everest – Earth – Jupiter – Star – Galaxy – Universe.

–openpit

About these ads

14 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by No one is a genius on May 20, 2014 at 02:36

    My opinion is everyone wishes they knew what the f they are trying to say. Our brains cant comprehend what you are trying to solve. They limit what are brains can learn. Truth is god is what we call an alien an actuall being from outer space with genius abilties hence why they call it god. The only way to really know is to talk to the gods themselves, and no not the invisible being in heavan..Sorry for my poor english.. One day

    Reply

  2. Randy, you’re not thinking outside the box. You’re predicating science with the word God. At best, this association. If you derive this scale of things from science and want to associate god with it, then you can’t differentiate anything from God, making everything a homogeneous manifestation of God, thereby negating any dynamic existing outside or inside that construct, an idea that exists in your mind. You’re in the God box. Please prove your theory. I can substitute your word “god” with “cricket sandwich” and get the same paradigm. You’re scared and fearful of what you don’t care to learn about. Particle astrophysics is difficult material to understand, and without math, it seems like utter fantasy.Like cricket sandwiches.

    Reply

    • Posted by Righteous Randy Ray on January 4, 2013 at 03:54

      First let me change one of my words to “Deity” vs. “God”. Whatever your philosophy is…the simple “fact” is the Big Bang theory is the only foundation of creativity that we as humans have…thus far. So science can not say or does not know what caused or created it. Therefore, some “it” or “Deity” created the 3rd dimensional universe as we know it whether “it” came from another dimension or a time/space continuum. All I’m saying is my theory is better than yours because you haven’t gave one, therefore you do not have the right/priviledge to dispute someone else’s UNLESS you have your own theory. Again…my theory is (thus far) that a Deity of light and/or energy from the infinite dimension worked itself backwords to the 3rd dimension BUT the darkness or dark matter got here first from perhaps the zero dimension yet the light is slowly overtaking the darkness in our universe. At least I have a theory. If you don’t…then stop typing just to make a point that is MUTE!

      Reply

      • I’m not sure if the Big Bang theory is the only one we have, but it is buiilt upon science that can be applied to different fields of knowledge. Christianity can be applied to…Christianity, as it doesn’t integrate other religions, because they’re not provable with any sufficient data. Religion just allows people to believe that science, which is a discipline which allows for approximations of certainty to be allowable based upon observations which support wide ranges of phenomena. The Bible doesn’t prove gravity. They didn’t even know what gravity was back 2000 years ago, let alone a wheelbarrow, which would have been equally as exciting to someone accustomed to basing their worldview on fearing that an invisible man flying around in the sky wanted to hurt them forever, violently as possible, in return for coming up with different ideas about how things work. Good science comes from bad science, but religion never corrects or improves itself. I allow that I don’t know what happened at any time before the Planck epoch, which is from zero to 10−43seconds, but there are different theories which allow that to not be relevant considering time is just essentially energy in two or more potentially different dimensions or infinities. If your theory is better, can you prove it? I don’t think your cosmological net will catch this very large fish of a universe or multiverse. if there is an entity distinct from brane collisions, zero-time Big Bang explosions, fermion smearing, or whatever, it would be evident outside of people’s heads. Your theory is better for you, and you alone, but it doesn’t make science better. I don’t personally have a theory, so you can’t even compare your certainty to whatever million hours of scientific observation that I gleefully support, because I don’t claim to author it. You can say “Deity” or whatever, but naming something you don’t understand tells nothing. Stop acting like you can trump science. What if I thought all things were a simulation happening at the same time, but because of entanglement it was necessary for asymmetrical quantum wave collapses to occur in order to simply allow for the exiistence of anything to occur. No deity. What if the deity is a chicken sandwich? A chicken sandwich fighting ghost crickets from the Black Lagoon? And we might just win…if there was enough mayo in the universe.

      • Posted by Righteous Randy Ray on January 4, 2013 at 13:00

        Again…fiftystatebanana…if you do not have the wisdom to come up with your own unique theory…then keep the mute button engaged! Besides…envy was around alot longer than your existance in the 3rd dimension!

      • How long was envy around?

      • Posted by Righteous Randy Ray on January 5, 2013 at 01:33

        Envy was around about the same timeframe my “light & dark dimensions” & “big is really small & vice versa” theories were around…much much longer than your “lack of any theory at all but, you want to criticise others because you are mentally weak & incapable of creating/originating your own theory!” That’s how long! Boy did you just get “SLAPPED…again & again!”

      • I’m curious. How is big really small and small really big? And what are light dimensions and dark dimensions? i’m aware that you’re slapping me mentally. maybe you can help me understand how light dimensions and dark dimensions are affecting big things that are small and small things which are big, and provide me with examples. Also, envy, if I’m not mistaken – but I probably am – existed before your theories. Perhaps the lack of theories is a dimension interacting with the slap force. How does my lack of theories provide me with energy from slap force? Is slap dependent upon or affected by elements of the two distinct dimensions you’ve spoken of i.e. light and dark. Are these once again like chicken meat dimensions? Please respond before the ghost crickets resume their awful racket. as far as I know an antiphoton is a photon, and the exchange of the two is virtually identical. That means that there is no difference between a dimension based upon light and something “antilight”. It’s the same thing. When particles released in beta decays of neutrons and protons and such, momentum of light is conserved, but there’s next -to-zero mass. Neutrinos have momentum as well. Imagine 65 billion pass through every centimeter of your body every second, touching nothing, and yet any one of them has enough energy to release megavolts of electric power, or gigavolts of electric power. Given the light and dark dimensions you speak of, and the slap force, and the envy force, I don’t see how interactions of your theorized dimension have any relevance upon chirality of particle symmetry. You need to take your theory and submit it to http://www.quantumfieldtheory.info/ immediately. Also, consider sending your envious theory to CERN

        Address: Route de Meyrin 385, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
        Phone:+41 22 767 84 84
        Hours: Friday hours 8:00 am–6:00 pm – See all
        Transit: Meyrin, CERN

        or to ICE CUBE at the South Pole where current trouble is being had installing photovoltaic cells deep within the ice in an array to capture neutrinos and other leptons floating through our atmosphere. My head is full of slap force, and is actually sucking energy from your bloodstream like a non-local foam of vampire foaming black hole locii, awaiting your next round of irrational rage. I was curious about you theory, but since it doesn’t actually exist – as opposed to the provable theories I’ve mentioned that you are free to dispute at the laboratories aforementioned, I suggest you do the math. Dude, you don’t impress me. I’m just not convinced of your theory. You have to do better than that. Threatening me with slaps and emotional distress is immature and ridiculous. I’d be wise to avoid your company in any situation. You are troubled. Please try to improve your abilities to engage people in discourse. Thanks. Happy sleuthing!

      • And by the way – wisdom is knowledge used towards a mutually beneficial end. Otherwise it’s at best cleverness, like a parlor trick, and does no one any good. You have to build your theories upon the hard work of scientists who troubled their conscious struggles with fundamental questions about the universe with years of fruitless research, piles of mistakes and failures. You, arriving at utter certainty without a shred of proof, well, it’s silly.

      • Sorry if that was a bit incoherent, but my point is keep exploring and please chill out and don’t feel responsible for trying to apply the meaning of the universe to the quadzillion of moving parts in it. You’ll go crazy. I’m just saying, prove something, but don’t bother proving me wrong because i never claimed to be right, much less a particle astrophysicist. Happy sleuthing!

  3. Posted by Randy Ray on January 7, 2011 at 14:30

    Even as a philosopher who seeks answers to the questions of life, I claim to embrace the gift of wisdom verses education. Even though I do not have a BS (Bull Shit Degree), MS (More bull-Shit degree) or a PhD (Piled higher & Deeper degree), I would like to add to your well written article. How about a theory of thinking that beyond the deepest discovery of what is within (or smaller than) the photon (or bosen) is actually the entire universe contained within it and at that focal point is a Deity. Let’s call it the “Randy Ray Reverse Funnel Finding (Fhilosopher)”. Is there anyone out there who thinks outside the box as I? (E.g. – GEN 0:0 – …In the beginning?)

    Reply

  4. Posted by Marlon on February 6, 2010 at 21:07

    I don’t like how this goes from size, to weight, to size again. It makes it a lot harder to visualize/internalize how big they all are.

    Reply

  5. […] space at 23,000 miles per hour, taking a time-lapse photo of the moon passing in front of the earth. Though 31 million miles sounds like a long way away, in the grand scheme of things, that spacecraft […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: